Skip to content
  • «
  • 1
  • »

The search returned 2 results.

Margari v Greece and Negru v Republic of Moldova: A Step Towards ‘Substantive’ Interdependence? journal article

Mariavittoria Catanzariti

European Data Protection Law Review, Volume 9 (2023), Issue 4, Page 482 - 488

Case Margari v Greece, Application no 36705/16, Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (Third Section) of 20 June 2023 and Case Negru v Republic of Moldova, Application no 7336/11, Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (Second Section) of 27 June 2023 The cases offer a significant step towards the protection of the right to privacy in the context of criminal proceedings, addressing the one the risk to jeopardise the right to reputation of accused persons during criminal proceedings, focusing the other on the potential impact of criminal records collected by State agents on the presumption of innocence. Right to information and right to access have been considered by the Strasbourg Court as the key issues for effective judicial protection, not only in the field of data protection but through data protection in all fields, above all in trial.


Video Surveillance at Work – In Need of Regulation? (López Ribalda and Others App nos 1874/13 and 8567/13) journal article

Diana Dimitrova

European Data Protection Law Review, Volume 6 (2020), Issue 1, Page 152 - 157

López Ribalda and Others v Spain, Applications numbers 1874/13 and 8567/13, Judgment of European Court of Human Rights of 17 October 2019 Employees not notified of covert video surveillance at work. Other safeguards applicable. Domestic courts struck a fair balance in examining the privacy rights of the employees and the legitimate interests of the emplyoer. No violation of Article 8 ECHR.

  • «
  • 1
  • »