@article{miadzvetskaya2020google author = {Yuliya Miadzvetskaya and Geert Van Calster}, title = {Google at the Kirchberg Dock. On Delisting Requests, and on the Territorial Reach of the EU’s GDPR (C-136/17 GC and Others v CNIL, C‑507/17 Google Inc v CNIL)}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, year = {2020}, keywords = {right to be forgotten;delisting requests;sensitive data;freedom of expression;extraterritoriality;search engine operator;balancing competing rights}, abstract = {Case C-136/17 GC and Others v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and Case C‑507/17 Google Inc v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), Judgements of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 September 2019 Google is of course no stranger to the courtrooms at the Court of Justice of the European Union. Data protection laws are far from the only EU law subject-matter on which it acts (competition policy is a sector that springs to mind). In this case-note, we combine the review of the Court’s judgements in both C-136/17 GC and Others v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and C-505/17 Google Inc v Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL). Article 16 TFEU – Articles 8, 9, 12 and 14 of the Data Protection Directive – Articles 9, 10 and 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation – Articles 7, 8 and 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU}, url = {https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2020/1/20} doi = {10.21552/edpl/2020/1/20} }