Skip to content
  • «
  • 1
  • »

The search returned 6 results.



The Right to Privacy with Respect to the Processing of Personal Data in the Context of Controlling Tax Fraud journal article

Stephanie Mihail, Tijmen Wisman

European Data Protection Law Review, Volume 3 (2017), Issue 2, Page 265 - 272

Case C-73/16 Peter Puškár v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky, Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy, Court of Justice of the European Union, OJ 2016/C 165/07, 10 February 2016 - Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 30 March 2017 Articles 7, 8, 47(2) and 52 (1)(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, 31); Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (OJ 2016 L 119, 1). While awaiting the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation, questions on effective remedies, legal grounds for processing, admissibility of evidence and the relationship between the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights case law still occupy the CJEU.



Privacy: Alive and Kicking (Digital Rights Ireland: Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12) journal article

Tijmen Wisman

European Data Protection Law Review, Volume 1 (2015), Issue 1, Page 80 - 84

Digital Rights Ireland: Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12, 8 April 2014 “The modern dream of the totalitarian police, with its modern techniques, is incomparably more terrible. Now the police dreams that one look at the gigantic map on the office wall should suffice at any given moment to establish who is related to whom and in what degree of intimacy”


  • «
  • 1
  • »