Introduction ∙ Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s Reports Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 4 (2018), Ausgabe 2, Seite 209 - 212
Introduction ∙ Recent Developments and Overview of the Country Reports Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 4 (2018), Ausgabe 1, Seite 85 - 87
Introduction ∙ Recent Developments and Overview of the Country Reports Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 4 (2018), Ausgabe 3, Seite 344 - 346
Introduction ∙ Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioner’s Reports Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 4 (2018), Ausgabe 4, Seite 492 - 495
Introduction ∙ Recent Developments and Overview of the Country Reports Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 3 (2017), Ausgabe 3, Seite 369 - 371
Introduction ∙ Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioners’ Reports Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 3 (2017), Ausgabe 4, Seite 496 - 499
Introduction ∙ Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioners’ Reports Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 3 (2017), Ausgabe 1, Seite 84 - 87
Introduction ∙ Recent Developments and Overview of the Country and Practitioners’ Reports Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 3 (2017), Ausgabe 2, Seite 209 - 211
European Union ∙ ‘Weltimmo’ Reloaded: CJEU Further Clarifies the Concept of ‘Establishment’ Journal Artikel Mark D Cole European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 2 (2016), Ausgabe 3, Seite 377 - 380
From Digital Rights Ireland and Schrems in Luxembourg to Zakharov and Szabó/Vissy in Strasbourg: Journal Artikel What the ECtHR Made of the Deep Pass by the CJEU in the Recent Cases on Mass Surveillance Mark D Cole, Annelies Vandendriessche European Data Protection Law Review, Jahrgang 2 (2016), Ausgabe 1, Seite 121 - 129 Roman Zakharov v Russia (App no 47143/06) and Szabó and Vissy v Hungary (App no. 37138/14) In the past months, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has decided two major cases concerning issues of national mass surveillance measures. In Roman Zakharov v Russia of December 2015 the Grand Chamber and in Szabó and Vissy v Hungary of January 2016 the Fourth Section of the Strasbourg Court twice in short notice responded to individual applications made under Article 34 of the Convention regarding violations of the right to respect for private life and correspondence according to Article 8 of the Convention. Beyond the significant findings concerning these types of surveillance measures, the cases are noteworthy in view of the interplay between the ECtHR and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in relation to the right to privacy.